city: collect garbage citywide

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.73
, school district
Weight: 0.72
, park
Weight: 0.69
, sewer
Weight: 0.68
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.83
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.82
, new york city
Weight: 0.72
, mexico city
Weight: 0.71
, national park
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
collect garbage citywide 1.00
develop plan for recycle garbage 0.81
be at city 0.77
be fill with much trash 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(town, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(city, collect garbage citywide)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(park, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(city, collect garbage citywide)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(city, collect garbage citywide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(park, be at city)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(city, collect garbage citywide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(town, be at city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(city, collect garbage citywide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(park, be at city)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(city, collect garbage citywide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(town, be at city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(town, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(city, collect garbage citywide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(city, collect garbage citywide)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(park, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(city, collect garbage citywide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(city, collect garbage citywide)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(city, collect garbage citywide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(city, collect garbage citywide)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(city, collect garbage citywide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(city, develop plan for recycle garbage)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(city, collect garbage citywide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(city, be fill with much trash)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(city, collect garbage citywide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(city, develop plan for recycle garbage)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(city, collect garbage citywide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(city, develop plan for recycle garbage)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(city, collect garbage citywide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(city, be fill with much trash)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(city, collect garbage citywide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(city, be fill with much trash)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(city, collect garbage citywide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(city, be fill with much trash)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(city, collect garbage citywide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(city, develop plan for recycle garbage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(city, collect garbage citywide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(city, collect garbage citywide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(city, collect garbage citywide)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(city, collect garbage citywide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(city, collect garbage citywide)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(city, collect garbage citywide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(town, be at city)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(city, collect garbage citywide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(park, be at city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(city, collect garbage citywide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(town, be at city)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(city, collect garbage citywide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(park, be at city)