city: has place to deposit recycle material

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.73
, school district
Weight: 0.72
, park
Weight: 0.69
, sewer
Weight: 0.68
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.83
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.82
, new york city
Weight: 0.72
, mexico city
Weight: 0.71
, national park
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
has place to deposit recycle material 1.00
has recycle program 0.82
develop plan for recycle garbage 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(city, has place to deposit recycle material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(city, has place to deposit recycle material)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(city, has place to deposit recycle material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(city, develop plan for recycle garbage)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(city, has place to deposit recycle material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(city, has recycle program)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(city, has place to deposit recycle material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(city, has recycle program)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(city, has place to deposit recycle material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(city, develop plan for recycle garbage)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(city, has place to deposit recycle material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(city, has recycle program)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(city, has place to deposit recycle material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(city, has recycle program)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(city, has place to deposit recycle material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(city, develop plan for recycle garbage)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(city, has place to deposit recycle material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(city, develop plan for recycle garbage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(city, has place to deposit recycle material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(city, has place to deposit recycle material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(city, has place to deposit recycle material)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(city, has place to deposit recycle material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(city, has place to deposit recycle material)