claim: were in americas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lie
Weight: 0.62
, third party
Weight: 0.61
, belief
Weight: 0.61
, speculation
Weight: 0.59
Siblings proof
Weight: 0.69
, appeal
Weight: 0.59
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.59
, breach
Weight: 0.58
, intrusion
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
were in americas 1.00
were in americas limited 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(claim, were in americas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(claim, were in americas)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(claim, were in americas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(claim, were in americas limited)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(claim, were in americas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(claim, were in americas limited)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(claim, were in americas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(claim, were in americas limited)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(claim, were in americas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(claim, were in americas limited)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(claim, were in americas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(claim, were in americas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(claim, were in americas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(claim, were in americas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(claim, were in americas)