claim: were in americas limited

Related concepts

Parents	lie Weight: 0.62 , third party Weight: 0.61 , belief Weight: 0.61 , speculation Weight: 0.59
Siblings	proof Weight: 0.69 , appeal Weight: 0.59 , reimbursement Weight: 0.59 , breach Weight: 0.58 , intrusion Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property	Similarity
were in americas limited	1.00
were in americas	0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(claim, were in americas limited) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(claim, were in americas limited)

Similarity expansion

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(claim, were in americas limited) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(claim, were in americas)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.69

Salient(claim, were in americas limited) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(claim, were in americas)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(claim, were in americas limited) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(claim, were in americas)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(claim, were in americas limited) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(claim, were in americas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Salient(claim, were in americas limited) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(claim, were in americas limited) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(claim, were in americas limited)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(claim, were in americas limited) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(claim, were in americas limited)