cleaning: is underpaid job

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents job
Weight: 0.61
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, maintenance
Weight: 0.58
, duty
Weight: 0.58
, solution
Weight: 0.58
Siblings sweeping
Weight: 0.42
, laundry
Weight: 0.33
, plumbing
Weight: 0.33
, dishwasher
Weight: 0.33
, mowing
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is underpaid job 1.00
has state job 0.81
is level job 0.78
has state jobs 0.76
is low level job 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cleaning, is underpaid job)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(maintenance, has state jobs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, has state jobs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dishwasher, has state jobs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mowing, has state jobs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(cleaning, is underpaid job)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(dishwasher, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(dishwasher, has state jobs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(mowing, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(mowing, has state jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(cleaning, is underpaid job)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(cleaning, has state job)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cleaning, has state job)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cleaning, is level job)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(cleaning, is level job)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(cleaning, has state job)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(cleaning, has state jobs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(cleaning, is level job)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(cleaning, is low level job)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(cleaning, has state jobs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cleaning, is low level job)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cleaning, has state jobs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cleaning, is low level job)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cleaning, has state job)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cleaning, has state jobs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cleaning, is low level job)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cleaning, is level job)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cleaning, is underpaid job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cleaning, is underpaid job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(maintenance, has state jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(dishwasher, has state jobs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mowing, has state jobs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(maintenance, has state jobs)