maintenance: has state jobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.65
, service
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, need
Weight: 0.60
Siblings cleaning
Weight: 0.58
, lubrication
Weight: 0.57
, watering
Weight: 0.53
, refill
Weight: 0.40
, edging
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state jobs 1.00
jobs 0.94
find jobs 0.89
has state job 0.88
find more jobs 0.87
is level job 0.77
is underpaid job 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cleaning, has state jobs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cleaning, find more jobs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cleaning, has state job)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cleaning, find jobs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cleaning, is underpaid job)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cleaning, is level job)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(cleaning, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cleaning, has state jobs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(cleaning, find jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(cleaning, find jobs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(cleaning, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(cleaning, has state job)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(cleaning, find more jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cleaning, find more jobs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(cleaning, is level job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(cleaning, is level job)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cleaning, is underpaid job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(cleaning, is underpaid job)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(maintenance, has state jobs)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(maintenance, jobs)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(maintenance, jobs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(maintenance, jobs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, jobs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, has state jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(maintenance, has state jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cleaning, find jobs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(cleaning, has state jobs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cleaning, is level job)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cleaning, has state job)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(cleaning, find more jobs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cleaning, is underpaid job)