cleanliness: be important in retail

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.63
, virtue
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, standard
Weight: 0.62
Siblings quality
Weight: 0.34
, friendliness
Weight: 0.33
, satisfaction
Weight: 0.33
, consistency
Weight: 0.32
, fecal matter
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in retail 1.00
be important in business 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be important in retail)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be important in retail)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(standard, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be important in retail)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(standard, be important in business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(issue, be important in business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important in business)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(quality, be important in business)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(cleanliness, be important in retail)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(cleanliness, be important in retail)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(standard, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(cleanliness, be important in retail)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(consistency, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(consistency, be important in business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(quality, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(quality, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(cleanliness, be important in retail)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(cleanliness, be important in business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be important in business)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(cleanliness, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in retail)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be important in retail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(standard, be important in business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(quality, be important in business)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(consistency, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(standard, be important in business)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(cleanliness, be important in retail)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)