cleaver: be considered good

Related concepts

Parents	knife Weight: 0.65 , tool Weight: 0.58 , weapon Weight: 0.48 , item Weight: 0.46 , member Weight: 0.42
Siblings	butter knife Weight: 0.37 , pocket knife Weight: 0.36 , swiss army knife Weight: 0.35 , crowbar Weight: 0.33 , scalpel Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be considered good	1.00
be good on lucian	0.84
has quality good	0.77
be considered good on riven	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(cleaver, be considered good)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(weapon, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(cleaver, be considered good)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(knife, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(cleaver, be considered good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(knife, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(weapon, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality good)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(weapon, has quality good)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(swiss army knife, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(cleaver, be considered good)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(weapon, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(cleaver, be considered good)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(knife, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(cleaver, be considered good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(swiss army knife, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(swiss army knife, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(cleaver, be considered good)

Similarity expansion

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(cleaver, be good on lucian)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Salient(cleaver, be good on lucian)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(cleaver, be good on lucian)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(cleaver, be good on lucian)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(cleaver, be considered good on riven)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(cleaver, has quality good)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(cleaver, be considered good on riven)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(cleaver, has quality good)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(cleaver, be considered good on riven)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Salient(cleaver, has quality good)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(cleaver, be considered good on riven)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(cleaver, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(cleaver, be considered good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(cleaver, be considered good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(knife, has quality good)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(weapon, has quality good)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(swiss army knife, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(knife, has quality good)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(weapon, has quality good)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(cleaver, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)