client: be important to business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creditor
Weight: 0.63
, family member
Weight: 0.62
, enterprise
Weight: 0.61
, partner
Weight: 0.61
Siblings real estate agent
Weight: 0.67
, owner
Weight: 0.63
, drug dealer
Weight: 0.63
, samsung
Weight: 0.62
, rolling stone
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to business 1.00
be important in business 0.99
be to business 0.93
is business 0.93
be different to business 0.90
want business 0.89
is successful business 0.89
be different to most business 0.86
get into business 0.85
be interested in business 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(partner, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(client, be important to business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(enterprise, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(client, be important to business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(partner, be to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(client, be important to business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(enterprise, be different to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(client, be important to business)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(enterprise, be different to most business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(client, be important to business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(creditor, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(client, be important to business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(creditor, be important to business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(enterprise, be important to business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(partner, be to business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(enterprise, be different to business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(partner, be important in business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(enterprise, be different to most business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(partner, be important in business)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(partner, be to business)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be different to business)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be important to business)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be different to most business)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creditor, be important to business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is successful business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(owner, want business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(owner, be interested in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(partner, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(client, be important to business)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(enterprise, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(client, be important to business)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(partner, be to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(client, be important to business)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(creditor, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(client, be important to business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(enterprise, be different to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(client, be important to business)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(enterprise, be different to most business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(client, be important to business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(owner, want business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(owner, want business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(owner, be interested in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(owner, be interested in business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(samsung, is successful business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(samsung, is successful business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(client, be important to business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(client, be important to business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(client, be important to business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(creditor, be important to business)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(enterprise, be important to business)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(enterprise, be different to most business)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(enterprise, be different to business)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(partner, be to business)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(partner, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(owner, want business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(owner, be interested in business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(samsung, is successful business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(creditor, be important to business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(enterprise, be important to business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(partner, be to business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(enterprise, be different to most business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(enterprise, be different to business)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(client, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(partner, be important in business)