enterprise: be different to most business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.62
, sector
Weight: 0.61
, application
Weight: 0.58
, organization
Weight: 0.57
Siblings real estate
Weight: 0.67
, government
Weight: 0.65
, corporation
Weight: 0.65
, oil company
Weight: 0.63
, client
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different to most business 1.00
be different to business 0.93
be different from most businesses 0.91
be important to business 0.86
be different from businesses 0.84
be good company work for 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be different to most business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(client, be important to business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(enterprise, be different to most business)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(client, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(client, be important to business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(enterprise, be different to most business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(enterprise, be different to most business)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(enterprise, be different to most business)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be different from most businesses)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(enterprise, be different to most business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be different to business)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(enterprise, be different to most business)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(enterprise, be different from most businesses)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(enterprise, be different to most business)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(enterprise, be different to business)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(enterprise, be different to most business)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be different from businesses)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(enterprise, be different to most business)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(enterprise, be different to most business)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be different to most business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(enterprise, be different to most business)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(enterprise, be different to most business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be different to most business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(client, be important to business)