enterprise: be different from most businesses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.62
, sector
Weight: 0.61
, application
Weight: 0.58
, organization
Weight: 0.57
Siblings real estate
Weight: 0.67
, government
Weight: 0.65
, corporation
Weight: 0.65
, oil company
Weight: 0.63
, client
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from most businesses 1.00
be different from businesses 0.96
be different to most business 0.91
be different to business 0.86
be important to business 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be different from most businesses)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(client, be important to business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(enterprise, be different from most businesses)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(client, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(client, be important to business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(enterprise, be different from most businesses)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(enterprise, be different from most businesses)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(enterprise, be different from most businesses)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(enterprise, be different from businesses)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(enterprise, be different from most businesses)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(enterprise, be different from businesses)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(enterprise, be different from most businesses)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be different from businesses)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(enterprise, be different from most businesses)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(enterprise, be different from businesses)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(enterprise, be different from most businesses)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(enterprise, be different to most business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(enterprise, be different from most businesses)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(enterprise, be different to most business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(enterprise, be different from most businesses)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(enterprise, be different to business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(enterprise, be different from most businesses)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be different to business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(enterprise, be different from most businesses)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(enterprise, be different to business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(enterprise, be different from most businesses)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be different to most business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(enterprise, be different from most businesses)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(enterprise, be important to business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(enterprise, be different from most businesses)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(enterprise, be different to most business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(enterprise, be different from most businesses)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(enterprise, be different to business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(enterprise, be different from most businesses)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(enterprise, be important to business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(enterprise, be different from most businesses)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be important to business)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(enterprise, be different from most businesses)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(enterprise, be important to business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(enterprise, be different from most businesses)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(enterprise, be different from most businesses)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be different from most businesses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(enterprise, be different from most businesses)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(enterprise, be different from most businesses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be different from most businesses)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(client, be important to business)