enterprise: be good company work for

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.62
, sector
Weight: 0.61
, application
Weight: 0.58
, organization
Weight: 0.57
Siblings real estate
Weight: 0.67
, government
Weight: 0.65
, corporation
Weight: 0.65
, oil company
Weight: 0.63
, client
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good company work for 1.00
be good company work 0.99
be important to business 0.80
work 0.79
has quality good 0.78
be different to business 0.77
be different to most business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(enterprise, be good company work for)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(organization, work)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(enterprise, be good company work for)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sector, work)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(enterprise, be good company work for)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(application, work)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(enterprise, be good company work for)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(application, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(sector, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(organization, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(sector, work)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(organization, work)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(application, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(corporation, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(government, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(client, be important to business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(real estate, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(government, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(enterprise, be good company work for)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(organization, work)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(enterprise, be good company work for)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sector, work)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(enterprise, be good company work for)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(application, work)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(enterprise, be good company work for)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(government, work)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(government, work)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(client, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(client, be important to business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(government, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(government, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(real estate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(real estate, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(corporation, work)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(corporation, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(enterprise, be good company work for)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(enterprise, be good company work)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(enterprise, be good company work)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(enterprise, be good company work)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(enterprise, work)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(enterprise, work)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(enterprise, work)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(enterprise, be important to business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(enterprise, be different to most business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(enterprise, be different to business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(enterprise, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(enterprise, be different to business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(enterprise, be important to business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(enterprise, be important to business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(enterprise, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(enterprise, be different to business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(enterprise, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(enterprise, be different to most business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(enterprise, be different to most business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be different to business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be important to business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, work)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be different to most business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(enterprise, be good company work for)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(application, work)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(organization, work)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sector, work)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(government, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(real estate, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(client, be important to business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(corporation, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(government, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(application, work)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(organization, work)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sector, work)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(enterprise, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)