sector: work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents segment
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, factor
Weight: 0.54
, unit
Weight: 0.54
Siblings automobile industry
Weight: 0.76
, financial institution
Weight: 0.72
, oil company
Weight: 0.72
, public transport
Weight: 0.71
, industry
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
work 1.00
be in stuttgart work 0.96
work together increase 0.78
working with three-dimensional figure 0.77
working with figure 0.77
job 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(unit, working with three-dimensional figure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sector, work)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(segment, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sector, work)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sector, work)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(factor, work together increase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sector, work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(factor, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(segment, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(factor, work together increase)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, work)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(segment, work)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(factor, work together increase)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in stuttgart work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(segment, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(sector, work)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(sector, work)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(unit, working with three-dimensional figure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(sector, work)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(factor, work together increase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(sector, work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(public transport, be in stuttgart work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(public transport, be in stuttgart work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(sector, work)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(sector, job)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sector, job)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(sector, job)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sector, job)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(sector, work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sector, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(segment, work)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(factor, work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(factor, work together increase)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(public transport, be in stuttgart work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(segment, work)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(factor, work)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(factor, work together increase)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)