unit: working with three-dimensional figure

Related concepts

Parents	area Weight: 0.63 , facility Weight: 0.63 , market Weight: 0.61 , office Weight: 0.60
Siblings	central processing unit Weight: 0.79 , battalion Weight: 0.72 , division Weight: 0.69 , processor Weight: 0.66 , department Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property	Similarity
working with three-dimensional figure	1.00
working with three dimensional figure	0.85
be important in working word problem	0.77
work	0.77
need work together	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(area, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(unit, working with three-dimensional figure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(area, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(unit, working with three-dimensional figure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(area, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(unit, working with three-dimensional figure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(division, work)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(unit, working with three-dimensional figure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(department, need work together)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(unit, working with three-dimensional figure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(processor, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(area, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(unit, working with three-dimensional figure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(unit, working with three-dimensional figure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(processor, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(processor, work)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(unit, working with three-dimensional figure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(department, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(department, need work together)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(unit, working with three-dimensional figure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(division, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(division, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(unit, working with three-dimensional figure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)

Similarity expansion

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(unit, working with three-dimensional figure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(unit, working with three dimensional figure)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(unit, working with three-dimensional figure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(unit, working with three dimensional figure)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(unit, working with three-dimensional figure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Plausible(unit, working with three dimensional figure)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(unit, working with three-dimensional figure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(unit, be important in working word problem)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(unit, working with three-dimensional figure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(unit, be important in working word problem)

...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(unit, working with three-dimensional figure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(unit, working with three-dimensional figure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(unit, working with three-dimensional figure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(unit, working with three-dimensional figure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(area, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(unit, working with three-dimensional figure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(processor, work)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(unit, working with three-dimensional figure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(department, need work together)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(unit, working with three-dimensional figure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(division, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(unit, working with three-dimensional figure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(area, work)