unit: working with three-dimensional figure

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, market
Weight: 0.61
, office
Weight: 0.60
Siblings central processing unit
Weight: 0.79
, battalion
Weight: 0.72
, division
Weight: 0.69
, processor
Weight: 0.66
, department
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
working with three-dimensional figure 1.00
working with three dimensional figure 0.85
be important in working word problem 0.77
work 0.77
need work together 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(area, work)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(area, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(area, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(division, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(department, need work together)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(processor, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(area, work)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(processor, work)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(processor, work)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(department, need work together)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(department, need work together)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(division, work)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(division, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(unit, working with three dimensional figure)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(unit, working with three dimensional figure)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(unit, working with three dimensional figure)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(unit, be important in working word problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(unit, be important in working word problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(unit, be important in working word problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(unit, working with three dimensional figure)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(unit, be important in working word problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(area, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(processor, work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(department, need work together)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(division, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(unit, working with three-dimensional figure)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(area, work)