client: buy more

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creditor
Weight: 0.63
, family member
Weight: 0.62
, enterprise
Weight: 0.61
, partner
Weight: 0.61
Siblings real estate agent
Weight: 0.67
, owner
Weight: 0.63
, drug dealer
Weight: 0.63
, samsung
Weight: 0.62
, rolling stone
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
buy more 1.00
want buy 0.90
buy expensive cars 0.85
buy cars 0.84
be more expensive than alamo 0.81
buy houses at prices 0.81
buy houses at lower prices 0.81
is more expensive 0.81
buy jewelry 0.80
withhold sale price 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(enterprise, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(client, buy more)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(client, buy more)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(enterprise, is more expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, is more expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, buy jewelry)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, withhold sale price)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, buy houses at lower prices)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, buy cars)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, buy houses at prices)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(enterprise, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(client, buy more)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(client, buy more)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(drug dealer, buy jewelry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(drug dealer, buy jewelry)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(real estate agent, buy houses at lower prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, buy houses at lower prices)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(real estate agent, withhold sale price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, withhold sale price)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(drug dealer, buy cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(drug dealer, buy cars)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(real estate agent, buy houses at prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, buy houses at prices)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(client, buy more)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(client, want buy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(client, want buy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(client, want buy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(client, want buy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(client, buy more)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(client, buy more)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(enterprise, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(drug dealer, buy jewelry)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(real estate agent, withhold sale price)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(real estate agent, buy houses at lower prices)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(real estate agent, buy houses at prices)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(drug dealer, buy cars)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(client, buy more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(enterprise, is more expensive)