client: is rude

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creditor
Weight: 0.63
, family member
Weight: 0.62
, enterprise
Weight: 0.61
, partner
Weight: 0.61
Siblings real estate agent
Weight: 0.67
, owner
Weight: 0.63
, drug dealer
Weight: 0.63
, samsung
Weight: 0.62
, rolling stone
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
is rude 1.00
be in sg rude 0.82
is pushy 0.80
is demeaning 0.78
be in arrogant 0.78
is annoying 0.77
is abusive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(partner, is demeaning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(client, is rude)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(partner, is abusive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(client, is rude)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(client, is rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(partner, is demeaning)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(client, is rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(partner, is abusive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(client, is rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(partner, is demeaning)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(client, is rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(partner, is abusive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(client, is rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is rude)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(client, is rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, be in sg rude)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(client, is rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is pushy)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(client, is rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, be in arrogant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(partner, is demeaning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(client, is rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(client, is rude)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(partner, is abusive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(client, is rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(client, is rude)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(client, is rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(real estate agent, is rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, is rude)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(client, is rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(real estate agent, be in sg rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, be in sg rude)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(client, is rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(real estate agent, is pushy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, is pushy)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(client, is rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(real estate agent, be in arrogant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, be in arrogant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(client, is rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(client, is rude)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(client, is rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(client, is rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(client, is rude)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(client, is rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(client, is rude)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(client, is rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(partner, is demeaning)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(client, is rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(partner, is abusive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(client, is rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(real estate agent, is pushy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(client, is rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(real estate agent, be in sg rude)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(client, is rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(real estate agent, be in arrogant)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(client, is rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(real estate agent, is rude)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(client, is rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(partner, is demeaning)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(client, is rude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(partner, is abusive)