real estate agent: is rude

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents real estate
Weight: 0.73
, client
Weight: 0.67
, business people
Weight: 0.67
, individual
Weight: 0.64
Siblings appraiser
Weight: 0.60
, condo
Weight: 0.35
, townhouse
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is rude 1.00
be in sg rude 0.82
is pushy 0.80
be in arrogant 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(client, is rude)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(real estate agent, is rude)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(real estate agent, is rude)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(client, is rude)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is rude)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(client, is rude)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(client, is rude)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(real estate agent, is rude)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, is rude)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(real estate agent, is rude)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(real estate agent, is rude)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(real estate agent, is rude)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, be in sg rude)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(real estate agent, is rude)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(real estate agent, be in sg rude)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(real estate agent, is rude)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, be in sg rude)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(real estate agent, is rude)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, is pushy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(real estate agent, is rude)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(real estate agent, is pushy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(real estate agent, is rude)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(real estate agent, be in sg rude)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(real estate agent, is rude)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is pushy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(real estate agent, is rude)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(real estate agent, is pushy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(real estate agent, is rude)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, be in arrogant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(real estate agent, is rude)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(real estate agent, be in arrogant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(real estate agent, is rude)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(real estate agent, be in arrogant)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(real estate agent, is rude)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, be in arrogant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(real estate agent, is rude)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(real estate agent, is rude)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is rude)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(real estate agent, is rude)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(real estate agent, is rude)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is rude)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(client, is rude)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(real estate agent, is rude)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(client, is rude)