climber: climb on trees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents form
Weight: 0.48
, plant
Weight: 0.44
, woman
Weight: 0.43
, child
Weight: 0.43
Siblings ivy
Weight: 0.51
, sherpa
Weight: 0.49
, nasturtium
Weight: 0.47
, clematis
Weight: 0.40
, rider
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
climb on trees 1.00
climb 0.88
climb mountains 0.86
climb lhotse face 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(climber, climb on trees)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(nasturtium, climb)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(climber, climb on trees)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(ivy, climb)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(climber, climb on trees)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(clematis, climb)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(climber, climb on trees)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(nasturtium, climb)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(nasturtium, climb)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(climber, climb on trees)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(ivy, climb)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(ivy, climb)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(climber, climb on trees)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(clematis, climb)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(clematis, climb)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(climber, climb on trees)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(climber, climb on trees)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(climber, climb on trees)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(climber, climb)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(climber, climb on trees)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(climber, climb)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(climber, climb on trees)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(climber, climb lhotse face)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(climber, climb on trees)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(climber, climb lhotse face)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(climber, climb on trees)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(climber, climb)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(climber, climb on trees)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(climber, climb lhotse face)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(climber, climb on trees)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(climber, climb lhotse face)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(climber, climb on trees)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(climber, climb mountains)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(climber, climb on trees)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(climber, climb mountains)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(climber, climb on trees)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(climber, climb mountains)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(climber, climb on trees)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(climber, climb mountains)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(climber, climb on trees)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(climber, climb)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(climber, climb on trees)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(climber, climb on trees)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(climber, climb on trees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(climber, climb on trees)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(climber, climb on trees)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(climber, climb on trees)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(nasturtium, climb)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(climber, climb on trees)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(clematis, climb)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(climber, climb on trees)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(ivy, climb)