:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(climber, climb)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(nasturtium, climb)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(climber, climb)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(ivy, climb)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(climber, climb)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(clematis, climb)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(climber, climb)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(ivy, climb)
⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(ivy, climb)
Salient implies Plausible
0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(climber, climb)
⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(climber, climb)
Similarity expansion
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(climber, climb)
⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(climber, climb)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(climber, climb)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(nasturtium, climb)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(climber, climb)
⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(clematis, climb)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(climber, climb)
⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(ivy, climb)