clo: has quality beauty

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.45
, pool
Weight: 0.42
, issue
Weight: 0.41
, derivative
Weight: 0.39
, language
Weight: 0.36
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.30
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.30
, florence
Weight: 0.30
, siri
Weight: 0.29
, puerto rican
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality beauty 1.00
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(clo, has quality beauty)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sherlock holmes, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(clo, has quality beauty)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(clo, has quality beauty)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(florence, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(clo, has quality beauty)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(siri, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clo, has quality beauty)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(siri, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(siri, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clo, has quality beauty)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(florence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(florence, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clo, has quality beauty)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(mcdonalds, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clo, has quality beauty)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(sherlock holmes, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sherlock holmes, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clo, has quality beauty)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(clo, has quality beauty)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(clo, has quality beauty)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(clo, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(clo, has quality beauty)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(clo, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clo, has quality beauty)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(clo, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(clo, has quality beauty)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(clo, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(clo, has quality beauty)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(clo, has quality beauty)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(clo, has quality beauty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clo, has quality beauty)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(clo, has quality beauty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(clo, has quality beauty)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(siri, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(clo, has quality beauty)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(florence, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(clo, has quality beauty)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(clo, has quality beauty)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sherlock holmes, has quality good)