clo: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.45
, pool
Weight: 0.42
, issue
Weight: 0.41
, derivative
Weight: 0.39
, language
Weight: 0.36
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.30
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.30
, florence
Weight: 0.30
, siri
Weight: 0.29
, puerto rican
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality beauty 0.77
has quality definition 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(clo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sherlock holmes, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(clo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(clo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(florence, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(clo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(siri, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(clo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(siri, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(siri, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(clo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(florence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(florence, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(clo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(mcdonalds, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(clo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(sherlock holmes, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sherlock holmes, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(clo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(clo, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(clo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(clo, has quality beauty)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(clo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(clo, has quality definition)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(clo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(clo, has quality beauty)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(clo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(clo, has quality definition)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(clo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(clo, has quality beauty)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(clo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(clo, has quality definition)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(clo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(clo, has quality beauty)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(clo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(clo, has quality definition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(clo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(clo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(clo, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(clo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(clo, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(clo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(siri, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(clo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(florence, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(clo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(clo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sherlock holmes, has quality good)