:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(style, is review)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(clog, is reviews)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(clog, is reviews)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(style, is review)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(clog, is reviews)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(style, is review)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(clog, is reviews)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(clog, is reviews)
Similarity expansion
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(clog, is reviews)
⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(clog, reviews)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(clog, is reviews)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(clog, reviews)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(clog, is reviews)
⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(clog, reviews)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(clog, is reviews)
⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(clog, is review)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(clog, is reviews)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(clog, review)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(clog, is reviews)
⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(clog, reviews)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(clog, is reviews)
⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(clog, review)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(clog, is reviews)
⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(clog, is review)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(clog, is reviews)
⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(clog, is review)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(clog, is reviews)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(clog, review)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(clog, is reviews)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(clog, is review)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(clog, is reviews)
⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(clog, review)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(clog, is reviews)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(clog, is reviews)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(clog, is reviews)
⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(style, is review)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child