cloning: affect culture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.60
, technology
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, subject
Weight: 0.55
, practice
Weight: 0.55
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.33
, nanotechnology
Weight: 0.32
, euthanasia
Weight: 0.32
, hybridization
Weight: 0.32
, ultrasound
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect culture 1.00
affect human culture 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(technology, affect culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cloning, affect culture)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cloning, affect culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(technology, affect culture)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cloning, affect culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(technology, affect culture)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(technology, affect culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cloning, affect culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(cloning, affect culture)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cloning, affect culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(cloning, affect culture)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(cloning, affect culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(cloning, affect human culture)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cloning, affect culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(cloning, affect human culture)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cloning, affect culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cloning, affect human culture)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(cloning, affect culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(cloning, affect human culture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(cloning, affect culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cloning, affect culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cloning, affect culture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cloning, affect culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cloning, affect culture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cloning, affect culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(technology, affect culture)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(cloning, affect culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(technology, affect culture)