closure: be important in mentoring relationship

Related concepts

Parents	term Weight: 0.58 , action Weight: 0.56 , application Weight: 0.54 , condition Weight: 0.53
Siblings	zipper Weight: 0.54 , stopper Weight: 0.41 , construction site Weight: 0.32 , dismissal Weight: 0.31 , strike Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important in mentoring relationship	1.00
be important in relationship	0.85
affect employment relationships	0.79
be important in counseling	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(closure, be important in mentoring relationship) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(strike, affect employment relationships)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(closure, be important in mentoring relationship) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(strike, affect employment relationships) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(strike, affect employment relationships)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(closure, be important in mentoring relationship) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Salient(closure, be important in mentoring relationship)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(closure, be important in mentoring relationship) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(closure, be important in relationship)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(closure, be important in mentoring relationship) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(closure, be important in relationship)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.10

Salient(closure, be important in mentoring relationship) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Salient(closure, be important in relationship)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(closure, be important in mentoring relationship) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(closure, be important in counseling)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.37

Typical(closure, be important in mentoring relationship) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(closure, be important in relationship)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.10

Salient(closure, be important in mentoring relationship) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(closure, be important in counseling)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.37

Typical(closure, be important in mentoring relationship) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(closure, be important in counseling)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(closure, be important in mentoring relationship) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(closure, be important in counseling)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.10

Salient(closure, be important in mentoring relationship) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(closure, be important in mentoring relationship) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(closure, be important in mentoring relationship)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(closure, be important in mentoring relationship) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(closure, be important in mentoring relationship)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(closure, be important in mentoring relationship) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(strike, affect employment relationships)