cn tower: has state wonder

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tower
Weight: 0.68
, attraction
Weight: 0.62
, building
Weight: 0.57
, landmark
Weight: 0.54
, structure
Weight: 0.53
Siblings eiffel tower
Weight: 0.36
, control tower
Weight: 0.35
, skyscraper
Weight: 0.33
, apartment building
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state wonder 1.00
be wonder of world 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cn tower, has state wonder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(eiffel tower, be wonder of world)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cn tower, has state wonder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(eiffel tower, be wonder of world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(eiffel tower, be wonder of world)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cn tower, has state wonder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(cn tower, has state wonder)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(cn tower, has state wonder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(cn tower, be wonder of world)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(cn tower, has state wonder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cn tower, be wonder of world)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cn tower, has state wonder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(cn tower, be wonder of world)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cn tower, has state wonder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cn tower, be wonder of world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(cn tower, has state wonder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(cn tower, has state wonder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cn tower, has state wonder)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cn tower, has state wonder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(cn tower, has state wonder)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cn tower, has state wonder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(eiffel tower, be wonder of world)