cobbler: be called cobbler

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dessert
Weight: 0.71
, craftsman
Weight: 0.50
, trade
Weight: 0.49
, cake
Weight: 0.48
, project
Weight: 0.48
Siblings tiramisu
Weight: 0.37
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.36
, custard
Weight: 0.36
, lemon curd
Weight: 0.36
, apple pie
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called cobbler 1.00
be called cobblers 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(dessert, be called cobbler)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(cobbler, be called cobbler)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cobbler, be called cobbler)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(dessert, be called cobbler)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(cobbler, be called cobbler)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(dessert, be called cobbler)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(dessert, be called cobbler)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(cobbler, be called cobbler)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(cobbler, be called cobbler)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cobbler, be called cobbler)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(cobbler, be called cobbler)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(cobbler, be called cobbler)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cobbler, be called cobblers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(cobbler, be called cobbler)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(cobbler, be called cobblers)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cobbler, be called cobbler)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(cobbler, be called cobblers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(cobbler, be called cobbler)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cobbler, be called cobblers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(cobbler, be called cobbler)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(cobbler, be called cobbler)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(cobbler, be called cobbler)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cobbler, be called cobbler)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(cobbler, be called cobbler)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(cobbler, be called cobbler)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dessert, be called cobbler)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(cobbler, be called cobbler)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dessert, be called cobbler)