cochlea: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.55
, structure
Weight: 0.50
, organ
Weight: 0.48
, middle ear
Weight: 0.45
, inner ear
Weight: 0.45
Siblings bone tissue
Weight: 0.34
, salivary gland
Weight: 0.34
, cerebral cortex
Weight: 0.34
, vascular tissue
Weight: 0.34
, adrenal cortex
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality system 0.82
has quality worth 0.82
has quality definition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(middle ear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cochlea, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cochlea, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(middle ear, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cochlea, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tissue, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cochlea, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(organ, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cochlea, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(middle ear, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tissue, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(organ, has quality worth)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(structure, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(middle ear, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(middle ear, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(middle ear, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(structure, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tissue, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(organ, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, has quality system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(middle ear, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(cochlea, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(middle ear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(cochlea, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(cochlea, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tissue, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(cochlea, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(organ, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(cochlea, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(vascular tissue, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(vascular tissue, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, has quality system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(cochlea, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cochlea, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(cochlea, has quality definition)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality definition)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(cochlea, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cochlea, has quality definition)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(cochlea, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(cochlea, has quality definition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cochlea, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(middle ear, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tissue, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(middle ear, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(organ, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, has quality system)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tissue, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(middle ear, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(organ, has quality worth)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(cochlea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(middle ear, has quality good)