cochlea: has quality definition

Related concepts

Parents	tissue Weight: 0.55 , structure Weight: 0.50 , organ Weight: 0.48 , middle ear Weight: 0.45 , inner ear Weight: 0.45
Siblings	bone tissue Weight: 0.34 , salivary gland Weight: 0.34 , cerebral cortex Weight: 0.34 , vascular tissue Weight: 0.34 , adrenal cortex Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality definition	1.00
has quality system	0.77
has quality good	0.76
has quality bad	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(middle ear, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(cochlea, has quality definition)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(cochlea, has quality definition)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(tissue, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(cochlea, has quality definition)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(middle ear, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(cochlea, has quality definition)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(tissue, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(middle ear, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(structure, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(middle ear, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(middle ear, has quality bad)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(middle ear, has quality good)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(structure, has quality good)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(tissue, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, has quality system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(middle ear, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(cochlea, has quality definition)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(cochlea, has quality definition)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(tissue, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(cochlea, has quality definition)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(middle ear, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(cochlea, has quality definition)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(vascular tissue, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, has quality system)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(vascular tissue, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(cochlea, has quality definition)

Similarity expansion

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Salient(cochlea, has quality bad)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(cochlea, has quality bad)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality bad)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.84

Typical(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(cochlea, has quality bad)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(cochlea, has quality good)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.84

Typical(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(cochlea, has quality good)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(cochlea, has quality good)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality definition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(cochlea, has quality definition)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(tissue, has quality good)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(middle ear, has quality bad)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(middle ear, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(vascular tissue, has quality system)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(vascular tissue, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.84

Typical(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(tissue, has quality good)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.84

Typical(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.84

Typical(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(middle ear, has quality bad)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.84

Typical(cochlea, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(middle ear, has quality good)