cocker spaniel: look different

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.80
, puppy
Weight: 0.70
, animal
Weight: 0.52
, medium
Weight: 0.38
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.42
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.42
, dachshund
Weight: 0.40
, small dog
Weight: 0.40
, poodle
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
look different 1.00
look sad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, look different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(poodle, look different)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, look different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(beagle, look sad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cocker spaniel, look different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(poodle, look different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(poodle, look different)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cocker spaniel, look different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(beagle, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(beagle, look sad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cocker spaniel, look different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(cocker spaniel, look different)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cocker spaniel, look different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, look sad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, look different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, look sad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(cocker spaniel, look different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(cocker spaniel, look sad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(cocker spaniel, look different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, look sad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(cocker spaniel, look different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, look different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, look different)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cocker spaniel, look different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, look different)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, look different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(poodle, look different)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, look different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(beagle, look sad)