cocker spaniel: look sad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.80
, puppy
Weight: 0.70
, animal
Weight: 0.52
, medium
Weight: 0.38
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.42
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.42
, dachshund
Weight: 0.40
, small dog
Weight: 0.40
, poodle
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
look sad 1.00
look different 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(beagle, look sad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(poodle, look different)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cocker spaniel, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(beagle, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(beagle, look sad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cocker spaniel, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(poodle, look different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(poodle, look different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cocker spaniel, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(cocker spaniel, look sad)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, look different)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(cocker spaniel, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(cocker spaniel, look different)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cocker spaniel, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, look different)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(cocker spaniel, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, look different)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(cocker spaniel, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, look sad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cocker spaniel, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, look sad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(beagle, look sad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(poodle, look different)