coffe: was invented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.44
, item
Weight: 0.39
, flavor
Weight: 0.27
, great
Weight: 0.24
, taste
Weight: 0.24
Siblings coffee
Weight: 0.32
, hot coffee
Weight: 0.32
, soda
Weight: 0.31
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.31
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
was invented 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(coffe, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, was invented)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(coffe, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(soda, was invented)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(coffe, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, was invented)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(coffe, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(coffee, was invented)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(coffe, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(coffee, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(coffee, was invented)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(coffe, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(chocolate milk, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, was invented)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(coffe, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(soda, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(soda, was invented)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(coffe, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hot chocolate, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(coffe, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(coffe, was invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(coffe, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(coffe, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(coffe, was invented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(coffe, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(coffe, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(coffe, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, was invented)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(coffe, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(coffee, was invented)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(coffe, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, was invented)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(coffe, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(soda, was invented)