coil: compare to flavor build

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.59
, magnetic field
Weight: 0.59
, element
Weight: 0.58
, pattern
Weight: 0.55
Siblings thermistor
Weight: 0.34
, helix
Weight: 0.34
, rod
Weight: 0.33
, dipole
Weight: 0.33
, spline
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
compare to flavor build 1.00
compare to good flavor build 0.99
compare to flavor 0.96
compare to good flavor 0.95
affect taste 0.79
taste bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(coil, compare to flavor build)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(coil, compare to flavor build)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(coil, compare to flavor build)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coil, compare to good flavor build)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(coil, compare to flavor build)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(coil, compare to good flavor build)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(coil, compare to flavor build)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(coil, compare to good flavor build)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(coil, compare to flavor build)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(coil, compare to good flavor)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(coil, compare to flavor build)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(coil, compare to good flavor)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(coil, compare to flavor build)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coil, compare to good flavor)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(coil, compare to flavor build)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(coil, compare to good flavor)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(coil, compare to flavor build)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(coil, compare to flavor)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(coil, compare to flavor build)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(coil, compare to good flavor build)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(coil, compare to flavor build)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(coil, compare to flavor)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(coil, compare to flavor build)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(coil, compare to flavor)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(coil, compare to flavor build)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(coil, compare to flavor)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(coil, compare to flavor build)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(coil, affect taste)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(coil, compare to flavor build)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(coil, taste bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(coil, compare to flavor build)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(coil, taste bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(coil, compare to flavor build)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(coil, taste bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(coil, compare to flavor build)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(coil, taste bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(coil, compare to flavor build)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(coil, affect taste)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(coil, compare to flavor build)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(coil, affect taste)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(coil, compare to flavor build)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(coil, affect taste)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(coil, compare to flavor build)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(coil, compare to flavor build)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(coil, compare to flavor build)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(coil, compare to flavor build)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(coil, compare to flavor build)