colleague: be for job

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents professor
Weight: 0.66
, teacher
Weight: 0.64
, mentor
Weight: 0.64
, researcher
Weight: 0.64
Siblings jim
Weight: 0.62
, steve
Weight: 0.57
, enrico fermi
Weight: 0.49
, scientist
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for job 1.00
be do job 0.96
be do better job 0.92
be for work 0.82
be for good work 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(colleague, be for job)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(colleague, be for job)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(colleague, be for job)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(colleague, be do job)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(colleague, be for job)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(colleague, be do better job)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(colleague, be for job)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(colleague, be do job)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(colleague, be for job)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(colleague, be do job)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(colleague, be for job)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(colleague, be do job)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(colleague, be for job)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(colleague, be for work)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(colleague, be for job)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(colleague, be for good work)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(colleague, be for job)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(colleague, be do better job)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(colleague, be for job)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(colleague, be for work)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(colleague, be for job)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(colleague, be do better job)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(colleague, be for job)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(colleague, be for good work)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(colleague, be for job)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(colleague, be do better job)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(colleague, be for job)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(colleague, be for work)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(colleague, be for job)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(colleague, be for good work)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(colleague, be for job)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(colleague, be for work)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(colleague, be for job)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(colleague, be for good work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(colleague, be for job)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(colleague, be for job)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(colleague, be for job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(colleague, be for job)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(colleague, be for job)