college: be in bad areas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents public school
Weight: 0.70
, degree
Weight: 0.66
, church
Weight: 0.66
, athlete
Weight: 0.65
Siblings college student
Weight: 0.69
, high school
Weight: 0.69
, university
Weight: 0.68
, elementary school
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in bad areas 1.00
be in bad neighborhoods 0.82
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(college, be in bad areas)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(college, be in bad areas)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(public school, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(college, be in bad areas)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(public school, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(college, be in bad areas)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(high school, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(college, be in bad areas)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(college, be in bad areas)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(college, be in bad areas)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(high school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(high school, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(college, be in bad areas)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(college, be in bad areas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(college, be in bad areas)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(college, be in bad areas)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(college, be in bad areas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(college, be in bad areas)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(college, be in bad areas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(college, be in bad areas)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(public school, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(college, be in bad areas)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(high school, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(college, be in bad areas)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(public school, has quality bad)