color blindness: be detected

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents blindness
Weight: 0.73
, disease
Weight: 0.64
, vision
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hair color
Weight: 0.36
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.36
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.35
, glaucoma
Weight: 0.35
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be detected 1.00
was discovered 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(color blindness, be detected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, was discovered)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(color blindness, be detected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(lyme disease, was discovered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, was discovered)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(color blindness, be detected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(color blindness, be detected)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(color blindness, be detected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(color blindness, be detected)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(color blindness, be detected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(color blindness, be detected)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(color blindness, be detected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(color blindness, be detected)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(color blindness, be detected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(color blindness, was discovered)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(color blindness, be detected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(color blindness, be detected)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(color blindness, be detected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(color blindness, was discovered)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(color blindness, be detected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(color blindness, was discovered)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(color blindness, be detected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(color blindness, was discovered)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(color blindness, be detected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(color blindness, be detected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(color blindness, be detected)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(color blindness, be detected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(color blindness, be detected)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(color blindness, be detected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(lyme disease, was discovered)