color blindness: was discovered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents blindness
Weight: 0.73
, disease
Weight: 0.64
, vision
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hair color
Weight: 0.36
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.36
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.35
, glaucoma
Weight: 0.35
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was discovered 1.00
be detected 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(color blindness, was discovered)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, was discovered)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(color blindness, was discovered)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(lyme disease, was discovered)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, was discovered)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(color blindness, was discovered)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(color blindness, was discovered)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(color blindness, was discovered)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(color blindness, be detected)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(color blindness, was discovered)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(color blindness, be detected)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(color blindness, was discovered)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(color blindness, be detected)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(color blindness, was discovered)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(color blindness, be detected)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(color blindness, was discovered)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(color blindness, be detected)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(color blindness, was discovered)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(color blindness, be detected)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(color blindness, was discovered)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(color blindness, be detected)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(color blindness, was discovered)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(color blindness, be detected)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(color blindness, was discovered)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(color blindness, was discovered)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(color blindness, was discovered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(color blindness, was discovered)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(color blindness, was discovered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(color blindness, was discovered)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(lyme disease, was discovered)