color blindness: is common

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents blindness
Weight: 0.73
, disease
Weight: 0.64
, vision
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hair color
Weight: 0.36
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.36
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.35
, glaucoma
Weight: 0.35
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is common 1.00
is more common 0.95
be more common in males 0.81
be more common than females 0.81
be less common among females 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(blindness, is common)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(color blindness, is common)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(color blindness, is common)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(blindness, is common)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(color blindness, is common)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(blindness, is common)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(blindness, is common)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(color blindness, is common)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(color blindness, is common)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(color blindness, is common)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(color blindness, is common)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(color blindness, is common)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(color blindness, is more common)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(color blindness, is common)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(color blindness, be more common in males)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(color blindness, is common)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(color blindness, is more common)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(color blindness, is common)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(color blindness, be more common in males)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(color blindness, is common)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(color blindness, be more common in males)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(color blindness, is common)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(color blindness, be more common than females)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(color blindness, is common)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(color blindness, is more common)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(color blindness, is common)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(color blindness, is more common)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(color blindness, is common)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(color blindness, be more common in males)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(color blindness, is common)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(color blindness, be more common than females)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(color blindness, is common)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(color blindness, be more common than females)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(color blindness, is common)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(color blindness, be more common than females)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(color blindness, is common)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(color blindness, be less common among females)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(color blindness, is common)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(color blindness, be less common among females)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(color blindness, is common)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(color blindness, be less common among females)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(color blindness, is common)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(color blindness, be less common among females)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(color blindness, is common)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(color blindness, is common)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(color blindness, is common)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(color blindness, is common)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(color blindness, is common)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(color blindness, is common)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(blindness, is common)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(color blindness, is common)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(blindness, is common)