:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(colt, is gelded)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(colt, is gelded)
Similarity expansion
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(colt, is gelded)
⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(colt, is horse)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(colt, is gelded)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(colt, is horse)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(colt, is gelded)
⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(colt, is horse)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(colt, is gelded)
⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(colt, is horse)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(colt, is gelded)
⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(colt, is gelded)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings