comedian: be bad at comedy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.69
, entertainer
Weight: 0.62
, singer
Weight: 0.58
, performer
Weight: 0.58
, character
Weight: 0.54
Siblings actor
Weight: 0.36
, musician
Weight: 0.36
, actress
Weight: 0.35
, dancer
Weight: 0.35
, rapper
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad at comedy 1.00
destroy comedy 0.89
become comedians 0.78
be funnier than comediennes 0.78
be funnier than female comediennes 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(comedian, be bad at comedy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(comedian, be bad at comedy)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(comedian, be bad at comedy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(comedian, destroy comedy)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(comedian, be bad at comedy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(comedian, destroy comedy)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(comedian, be bad at comedy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(comedian, destroy comedy)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(comedian, be bad at comedy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(comedian, destroy comedy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(comedian, be bad at comedy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(comedian, become comedians)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(comedian, be bad at comedy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(comedian, become comedians)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(comedian, be bad at comedy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(comedian, become comedians)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(comedian, be bad at comedy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(comedian, be funnier than female comediennes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(comedian, be bad at comedy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(comedian, be funnier than female comediennes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(comedian, be bad at comedy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(comedian, be funnier than female comediennes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(comedian, be bad at comedy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(comedian, be funnier than female comediennes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(comedian, be bad at comedy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(comedian, become comedians)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(comedian, be bad at comedy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(comedian, be bad at comedy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(comedian, be bad at comedy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(comedian, be bad at comedy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(comedian, be bad at comedy)