comedian: be funnier than female comediennes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.69
, entertainer
Weight: 0.62
, singer
Weight: 0.58
, performer
Weight: 0.58
, character
Weight: 0.54
Siblings actor
Weight: 0.36
, musician
Weight: 0.36
, actress
Weight: 0.35
, dancer
Weight: 0.35
, rapper
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be funnier than female comediennes 1.00
be funnier than comediennes 0.98
become comedians 0.81
be bad at comedy 0.77
is good actors 0.76
is actors 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(comedian, be funnier than female comediennes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(comedian, be funnier than female comediennes)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(comedian, be funnier than female comediennes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(comedian, become comedians)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(comedian, be funnier than female comediennes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(comedian, become comedians)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(comedian, be funnier than female comediennes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(comedian, become comedians)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(comedian, be funnier than female comediennes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(comedian, be bad at comedy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(comedian, be funnier than female comediennes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(comedian, be bad at comedy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(comedian, be funnier than female comediennes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(comedian, is actors)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(comedian, be funnier than female comediennes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(comedian, is actors)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(comedian, be funnier than female comediennes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(comedian, is good actors)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(comedian, be funnier than female comediennes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(comedian, is good actors)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(comedian, be funnier than female comediennes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(comedian, is actors)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(comedian, be funnier than female comediennes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(comedian, be bad at comedy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(comedian, be funnier than female comediennes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(comedian, is good actors)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(comedian, be funnier than female comediennes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(comedian, be bad at comedy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(comedian, be funnier than female comediennes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(comedian, become comedians)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(comedian, be funnier than female comediennes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(comedian, is good actors)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(comedian, be funnier than female comediennes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(comedian, is actors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(comedian, be funnier than female comediennes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(comedian, be funnier than female comediennes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(comedian, be funnier than female comediennes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(comedian, be funnier than female comediennes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(comedian, be funnier than female comediennes)