comforter: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, blanket
Weight: 0.53
, product
Weight: 0.53
, linen
Weight: 0.51
Siblings dummy
Weight: 0.46
, electric blanket
Weight: 0.33
, tablecloth
Weight: 0.33
, pillow case
Weight: 0.33
, bed sheet
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(blanket, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(comforter, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(blanket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(comforter, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(linen, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(comforter, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(linen, is best)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(comforter, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(linen, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(blanket, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(blanket, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(linen, is best)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(linen, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(linen, is best)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pillow case, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(dummy, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(electric blanket, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(bed sheet, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bed sheet, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(blanket, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(comforter, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(linen, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(comforter, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(blanket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(comforter, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(linen, is best)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(comforter, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bed sheet, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(bed sheet, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(dummy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(dummy, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(bed sheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(bed sheet, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(pillow case, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pillow case, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(electric blanket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(electric blanket, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(comforter, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(comforter, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(comforter, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(comforter, has quality bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(comforter, has quality bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(comforter, has quality better)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(comforter, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(comforter, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(linen, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(blanket, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(blanket, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(linen, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dummy, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pillow case, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(bed sheet, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bed sheet, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(electric blanket, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(linen, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(blanket, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(blanket, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(linen, is best)