blanket: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents comfort
Weight: 0.66
, gift
Weight: 0.65
, protection
Weight: 0.62
, accessory
Weight: 0.59
Siblings electric blanket
Weight: 0.82
, duvet
Weight: 0.56
, comforter
Weight: 0.53
, couch
Weight: 0.34
, pillow
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
is ungiven good 0.83
has quality worth 0.82
feel good 0.76
eat bad 0.75
bad for men 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(protection, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(blanket, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(blanket, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(blanket, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(comfort, eat bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(blanket, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(comfort, eat bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(gift, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(protection, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(gift, is ungiven good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(comfort, eat bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(protection, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gift, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(comforter, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(electric blanket, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(duvet, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(pillow, bad for men)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(comforter, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pillow, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(couch, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(comforter, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pillow, feel good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(protection, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(blanket, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(blanket, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(blanket, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(comfort, eat bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(blanket, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(comforter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(comforter, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(couch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(couch, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(comforter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(comforter, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(pillow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(pillow, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(electric blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(electric blanket, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(duvet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(duvet, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(comforter, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(comforter, has quality better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pillow, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pillow, feel good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(pillow, bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(pillow, bad for men)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(blanket, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(blanket, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(blanket, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(blanket, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(blanket, has quality worth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(blanket, has quality worth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(blanket, has quality worth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(blanket, feel good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(blanket, feel good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(blanket, feel good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality worth)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(blanket, feel good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(blanket, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(comfort, eat bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(protection, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(comforter, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(couch, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(comforter, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(duvet, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(comforter, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pillow, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(electric blanket, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pillow, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pillow, bad for men)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(protection, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(comfort, eat bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(blanket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)