blanket: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents comfort
Weight: 0.66
, gift
Weight: 0.65
, protection
Weight: 0.62
, accessory
Weight: 0.59
Siblings electric blanket
Weight: 0.82
, duvet
Weight: 0.56
, comforter
Weight: 0.53
, couch
Weight: 0.34
, pillow
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality good 0.85
has quality better 0.83
has quality bad 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(protection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(blanket, has quality worth)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(blanket, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(gift, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(protection, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(protection, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gift, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(comforter, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(electric blanket, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(duvet, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(comforter, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pillow, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(couch, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(comforter, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(protection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(blanket, has quality worth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(blanket, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(couch, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(couch, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(comforter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(comforter, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(pillow, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(pillow, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(comforter, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(comforter, has quality better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(duvet, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(duvet, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(comforter, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(comforter, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(electric blanket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(electric blanket, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(blanket, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(blanket, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(blanket, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(blanket, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(blanket, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(blanket, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(blanket, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(blanket, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(protection, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(comforter, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(couch, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(comforter, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(comforter, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(duvet, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pillow, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(electric blanket, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(blanket, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(protection, has quality good)