commercial: be louder on tv

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents production
Weight: 0.66
, land
Weight: 0.64
, activity
Weight: 0.63
, advertisement
Weight: 0.61
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.36
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.32
, national park
Weight: 0.32
, property
Weight: 0.32
, crown land
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be louder on tv 1.00
be louder than tv show 0.97
be much louder than tv shows 0.94
be louder than tv show itself 0.94
be louder than tv programs 0.94
be louder than tv programming 0.94
is louder 0.91
be louder than show 0.90
get again louder 0.89
be louder than programming 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(advertisement, is louder)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(commercial, be louder on tv)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(advertisement, is louder)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, is louder)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(advertisement, is louder)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(commercial, be louder on tv)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(commercial, be louder on tv)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(commercial, be louder than show)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(commercial, be louder than tv programming)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(commercial, be louder than tv programs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(commercial, be much louder than tv shows)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be much louder than tv shows)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(commercial, get again louder)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(commercial, is louder)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be louder than tv programming)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be louder than tv programs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(commercial, is louder)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(commercial, be louder than tv programming)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(commercial, be much louder than tv shows)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(commercial, be louder than tv programs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(commercial, be louder than show)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(commercial, get again louder)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(commercial, get again louder)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(commercial, is louder)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(commercial, be louder than tv programming)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(commercial, be much louder than tv shows)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(commercial, be louder than tv programs)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(commercial, is louder)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(commercial, get again louder)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be louder than show)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(commercial, be louder than show)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be louder on tv)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(commercial, be louder on tv)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(advertisement, is louder)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(commercial, be louder on tv)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(advertisement, is louder)