commercial: be louder than regular programming

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents production
Weight: 0.66
, land
Weight: 0.64
, activity
Weight: 0.63
, advertisement
Weight: 0.61
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.36
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.32
, national park
Weight: 0.32
, property
Weight: 0.32
, crown land
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be louder than regular programming 1.00
be louder than programming 0.97
be louder than tv programming 0.93
be louder than programs 0.90
be louder than tv programs 0.90
be louder than show 0.89
be louder than program 0.89
be louder than tv show 0.88
be much louder than tv shows 0.87
be louder on tv 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(commercial, be louder than regular programming)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(commercial, be louder than tv programming)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(commercial, be louder than programs)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(commercial, be louder than tv programming)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(commercial, be louder than tv programs)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(commercial, be louder than show)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(commercial, be louder than tv programming)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(commercial, be louder than program)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(commercial, be louder than programs)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(commercial, be much louder than tv shows)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(commercial, be louder on tv)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(commercial, be louder on tv)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(commercial, be louder than programs)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(commercial, be louder than tv programs)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(commercial, be louder than program)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(commercial, be louder than show)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(commercial, be louder than tv programs)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(commercial, be louder than show)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(commercial, be louder than program)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(commercial, be much louder than tv shows)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(commercial, be louder on tv)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(commercial, be much louder than tv shows)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be louder on tv)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be louder than tv programming)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be much louder than tv shows)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be louder than tv programs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be louder than program)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be louder than show)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be louder than programs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be louder than regular programming)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(commercial, be louder than regular programming)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(commercial, be louder than regular programming)