commission: is taxed higher

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents committee
Weight: 0.78
, city
Weight: 0.66
, proposal
Weight: 0.65
, county
Weight: 0.64
, commissioner
Weight: 0.62
Siblings council
Weight: 0.39
, board
Weight: 0.36
, senate
Weight: 0.35
, county court
Weight: 0.35
, authority
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is taxed higher 1.00
is taxed high 0.97
be taxed at higher rate 0.96
is taxed more 0.95
is taxed 0.95
be taxed at 40 0.95
get taxed more 0.94
get taxed 0.94
be taxed at rate 0.93
get taxed differently 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(commission, is taxed higher)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(commission, be taxed at 40)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(commission, be taxed at higher rate)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(commission, get taxed)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(commission, is taxed high)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(commission, is taxed)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(commission, get taxed more)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(commission, is taxed more)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(commission, be taxed at rate)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(commission, be taxed at 40)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(commission, get taxed differently)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(commission, be taxed at rate)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(commission, be taxed at higher rate)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(commission, is taxed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(commission, get taxed)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(commission, get taxed more)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(commission, be taxed at 40)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(commission, is taxed more)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(commission, be taxed at rate)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(commission, be taxed at higher rate)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(commission, get taxed differently)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(commission, is taxed high)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(commission, is taxed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(commission, be taxed at rate)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(commission, get taxed more)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(commission, is taxed more)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(commission, get taxed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(commission, be taxed at higher rate)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(commission, get taxed differently)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(commission, is taxed)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(commission, is taxed more)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(commission, is taxed high)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(commission, get taxed more)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(commission, be taxed at 40)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(commission, get taxed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(commission, get taxed differently)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(commission, is taxed high)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(commission, is taxed higher)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(commission, is taxed higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(commission, is taxed higher)