committee: be at city hall

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents council
Weight: 0.76
, department
Weight: 0.66
, body
Weight: 0.63
, group
Weight: 0.61
Siblings senate
Weight: 0.69
, executive
Weight: 0.67
, congress
Weight: 0.64
, board
Weight: 0.63
, chair
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at city hall 1.00
be at city 0.87
be at city council meet 0.81
be at town 0.80
be at auditorium 0.78
be at council chamber 0.78
be at school room 0.76
be at any large city 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(council, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(committee, be at city hall)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(council, be at council chamber) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(committee, be at city hall)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(council, be at city hall)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(council, be at council chamber)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(council, be at city hall)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(council, be at council chamber)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(chair, be at auditorium)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chair, be at city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chair, be at town)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(chair, be at any large city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(chair, be at school room)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(council, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(committee, be at city hall)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(council, be at council chamber) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(committee, be at city hall)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(chair, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(chair, be at city)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(chair, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(chair, be at town)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(chair, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(chair, be at any large city)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(chair, be at school room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(chair, be at school room)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(chair, be at auditorium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(chair, be at auditorium)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(committee, be at city hall)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(committee, be at city council meet)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(committee, be at city council meet)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(committee, be at city council meet)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(committee, be at city council meet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(committee, be at city hall)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(committee, be at city hall)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(council, be at city hall)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(council, be at council chamber)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chair, be at city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(chair, be at school room)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(chair, be at town)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(chair, be at any large city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(chair, be at auditorium)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(council, be at city hall)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(committee, be at city hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(council, be at council chamber)