communication: be different from nonverbal communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from nonverbal communication 1.00
be different from communication 0.85
be used in communication 0.82
be in communication 0.81
be used for communication 0.81
be different from technical communication 0.79
writing communication 0.79
be in business world different from communication 0.79
be in business world different from everyday communication 0.79
differ from animal communication 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fundamental, be in communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(communication, be different from nonverbal communication)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(communication, be different from nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fundamental, be in communication)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(communication, be different from nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fundamental, be in communication)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(communication, be different from nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(infrared, be used in communication)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(communication, be different from nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(infrared, be used for communication)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fundamental, be in communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(communication, be different from nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(communication, be different from nonverbal communication)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(communication, be different from nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(infrared, be used in communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(infrared, be used in communication)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(communication, be different from nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(infrared, be used for communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(infrared, be used for communication)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(communication, be different from nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(communication, be different from nonverbal communication)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(communication, be different from nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(communication, differ from animal communication)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(communication, be different from nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(communication, be different from communication)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(communication, be different from nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(communication, differ from animal communication)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(communication, be different from nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(communication, differ from animal communication)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(communication, be different from nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(communication, differ from animal communication)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(communication, be different from nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(communication, be different from communication)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(communication, be different from nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(communication, be different from communication)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(communication, be different from nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(communication, be different from communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(communication, be different from nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(communication, be different from nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(communication, be different from nonverbal communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(communication, be different from nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(communication, be different from nonverbal communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(communication, be different from nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fundamental, be in communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(communication, be different from nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(infrared, be used in communication)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(communication, be different from nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(infrared, be used for communication)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(communication, be different from nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fundamental, be in communication)