communication: be important in business

Related concepts

Parents	fundamental Weight: 0.64 , department Weight: 0.62 , gap Weight: 0.61 , failure Weight: 0.61
Siblings	coordination Weight: 0.57 , solicitation Weight: 0.54 , broadcasting Weight: 0.53 , acknowledgement Weight: 0.51 , infrared Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important in business	1.00
be important for business	0.99
be important in business environment	0.92
be important in businesses	0.89
affect business	0.88
be in business world	0.87
be in business world different	0.87
be vital to success of business	0.86
go into business	0.84
be important in organisation	0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(department, be important in organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(communication, be important in business)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(failure, go into business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(communication, be important in business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(communication, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(failure, go into business)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(communication, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(department, be important in organisation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(failure, go into business)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(department, be important in organisation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(department, be important in organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(communication, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(communication, be important in business)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(failure, go into business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(communication, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(communication, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(communication, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(communication, be important in business)

Similarity expansion

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(communication, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(communication, be important in business environment)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(communication, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(communication, be important in businesses)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(communication, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(communication, be important in business environment)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(communication, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(communication, be important in business environment)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(communication, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(communication, be important in businesses)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(communication, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in business environment)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(communication, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(communication, be important in businesses)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(communication, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in businesses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(communication, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(communication, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(communication, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(communication, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(failure, go into business)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(department, be important in organisation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(communication, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(failure, go into business)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(communication, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(department, be important in organisation)