failure: go into business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mistake
Weight: 0.67
, breach
Weight: 0.65
, disappointment
Weight: 0.61
, obstacle
Weight: 0.61
Siblings heart failure
Weight: 0.77
, omission
Weight: 0.66
, negligence
Weight: 0.61
, communication
Weight: 0.61
, flat tire
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
go into business 1.00
be important in business 0.84
be important for business 0.84
affect business 0.83
be in business world 0.82
be in business world different 0.82
affect business operation 0.78
be in business world different from communication 0.78
be important in business environment 0.78
be in business world different from everyday communication 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(failure, go into business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in business)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(failure, go into business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in business environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(failure, go into business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(communication, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in business)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(failure, go into business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(communication, be important in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in business environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(failure, go into business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(failure, go into business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(failure, go into business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(failure, go into business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(failure, go into business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(failure, go into business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(failure, go into business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(failure, go into business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(communication, be important in business)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(failure, go into business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(communication, be important in business environment)